A concise landlord guide for England on why the reforms are manageable when the right systems, paperwork and exit planning are already in place.
Updated: 31 March 2026 | Applies to: England | Law in force in phases from 1 May 2026
Bottom line
The Act changes process more than it changes the core economics of a well-run rental business. Landlords lose the shortcut of section 21, but they still retain routes to recover possession, increase rent lawfully, refuse pet requests where there is a valid reason, and protect returns if they tighten compliance and document decisions properly.
Important note: This guide is a commercial summary, not legal advice. It is designed to explain the practical landlord impact of the Renters Rights Act 2025. Seek professional legal advice before taking action.
What actually changes
From 1 May 2026, the first phase of the Act abolishes section 21 in England, replaces assured shorthold tenancies with assured periodic tenancies, limits rent increases to the revised section 13 route once per year with at least two months notice, bans rental bidding and most requests for rent in advance above one month, and requires landlords to consider pet requests within a set timeframe. Existing written tenancies generally do not need to be re-issued, but landlords must provide the government Information Sheet to relevant tenants by 31 May 2026.
Importantly, the Act does not apply to all tenancies. The following arrangements fall outside the assured tenancy regime and are unaffected by the reforms:
- Short-term lets and holiday lettings, which remain governed by common law and are not subject to the new periodic tenancy rules
- Corporate lets, where a company is the tenant rather than an individual, fall outside the Housing Act 1988 entirely and are therefore unaffected by the Act
- Tenancies where the annual rent exceeds £100,000, which sit outside the assured tenancy regime
- Purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) registered under an approved code, which is specifically exempt from the new regime
- Fixed-term tenancies with an original term of more than seven years granted before the relevant transitional dates are also carved out
Landlords operating in the short-let, serviced accommodation or corporate let space should note that their existing model is not impacted by these changes. This guide focuses on the standard private rented sector where the reforms do apply.
The practical reading for landlords
| Change | What it sounds like | What it really means in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Section 21 ends | You can no longer remove tenants easily | You need a valid section 8 ground and a paper trail. For organised landlords this is a legal process change, not the end of possession rights |
| All tenancies roll | You lose control because fixed terms go | Tenants can leave on notice, but landlords gain a clearer single system. Planning, referencing and tenant selection become more important at the start |
| Rent increases are formalised | You cannot keep up with the market | You still can review rent annually, but the increase must be justified, correctly served and defensible if challenged at the First-tier Tribunal |
| Pet requests must be considered | You must accept every pet | You must consider the request and give valid reasons if refusing. Thoughtful tenancy clauses and insurance checks matter more |
| Selling or moving in uses grounds | You can never get the property back | You still can recover possession for sale or occupation, but selling and move-in grounds carry restrictions on when they can be used and require the correct notice to be served |
The possession numbers in context
Much of the anxiety around the Act centres on possession. Before assessing the real-world impact, it is worth anchoring the discussion in actual data.
Key statistic
Ministry of Justice data shows that private landlord possession claims run at approximately 30,000 to 32,000 per year across England and Wales. With around 4.7 million households in the private rented sector, this represents roughly 0.65% of tenancies - one in every 155 properties in any given year.
The Health Foundation analysis of MoJ data confirms that private renters experience around 13 possession claims per 1,000 households annually. The English Housing Survey reports that only 4% of tenants who ended a tenancy in the past year said they were evicted or asked to leave by their landlord, the large majority leave of their own choice.
These numbers matter because they reframe the risk calculation. The section 8 process is slower and more expensive than section 21 was, but the probability that any given landlord will need it in any given year is low. The real question is not what does possession cost but what is the expected cost when the probability is factored in and on that basis, the impact for a well-run portfolio is modest.
Where possession risk is concentrated
The 0.65% figure masks significant variation. Possession risk is not evenly distributed across the sector. MoJ and Health Foundation data consistently shows higher claim rates in:
- London and major urban centres, which account for around 30 to 34% of all landlord possession claims despite representing a smaller proportion of total properties. Within London, boroughs such as Barking and Dagenham show claim rates well above the national average
- Areas of higher deprivation, where both housing costs and affordability pressures are elevated. Research from the Health Foundation notes that high deprivation and low housing costs can coincide with high eviction and repossession rates, meaning the risk is not confined to high-rent areas
- Tenancies where housing benefit or Universal Credit covers rent, where affordability is more volatile and the gap between Local Housing Allowance rates and market rents has widened considerably
- Higher-turnover property types such as HMOs, where individual room lets can create more frequent changes in occupancy and a higher frequency of low-level arrears situations
Landlords with portfolios in lower-risk locations letting to employed tenants with conventional referencing profiles face a materially lower possession probability than the sector average. Landlords operating at the higher-yield, higher-risk end of the market - deprived areas, benefit-reliant tenants, HMOs - face a meaningfully higher rate and should factor this into their cost modelling and insurance decisions.
Why the impact is often overstated
For a landlord who relies on weak documentation, reactive management and informal rent reviews, the Act is a real problem. For a landlord who already runs a professional operation, the changes are mostly an administrative and process upgrade.
The Act does not abolish possession. It redirects possession into stated grounds. Landlords can still act where there are serious rent arrears, anti-social behaviour, breach, sale, owner occupation and other recognised circumstances.
That is why the commercial conclusion is not that landlords should panic. It is that landlords should tighten their systems before the rules expose weak ones. This is not a death blow to the sector. It is a compliance filter.
The 7 steps that reduce the real-world impact
-
Audit every tenancy now. Know which occupiers will need the government Information Sheet by 31 May 2026 and who is responsible for serving it. Failure to serve can result in fines of up to £7,000.
-
Replace casual record keeping with a proper file. Store tenancy terms, inspection notes, rent schedules, arrears letters, repair logs, pet requests and all notices in one place.
-
Treat tenant selection as risk control. The removal of section 21 makes poor upfront referencing more expensive later. This is the single most effective risk mitigation available to landlords.
-
Build a rent review system. Review each property annually against evidence so rent increases are defensible rather than improvised. Document comparable rents in case of a First-tier Tribunal challenge.
-
Review insurance, mortgage conditions and pet clauses before answering pet requests. Refusals will need valid reasons rather than instinct or habit.
-
Use possession grounds strategically. If a property may need to be sold or recovered for family occupation, time your tenancy start and business plan around the restrictions on when those grounds can be used.
-
Raise property standards early. Later phases will bring the private rented sector database, ombudsman, Decent Homes Standard and Awaabs Law, so waiting until enforcement tightens is the costly option.
Insurance products for organised landlords
With the section 21 backstop removed, the tail risk of a genuinely difficult tenancy becomes more expensive to resolve. For landlords who are well organised, have robust referencing processes and are purchasing higher-yielding or higher-risk assets, a range of insurance products can convert that tail risk into a predictable annual cost.
Rent guarantee insurance
Rent guarantee insurance covers rent arrears and, in most cases, legal costs associated with section 8 possession proceedings. For organised landlords, this is the most directly relevant product post-reform.
Key features and conditions to understand:
- Most RGI policies require tenants to have passed the insurer's own referencing criteria - typically a credit check, income multiple test and employment status verification. Landlords who already conduct rigorous referencing will find this straightforward; those with more informal processes may need to upgrade
- Policies typically cover rent arrears from the point of default up to a monthly cap, and legal costs up to a defined limit, commonly £50,000 to £100,000. Some policies include eviction cover
- The product is most valuable precisely for higher-risk asset classes - HMOs, properties in higher-deprivation areas, benefit-reliant tenancies where allowed by the insurer - where the base rate of possession risk is above the sector average
- Annual premiums typically range from £200 to £500 per property for standard tenancies, rising for higher-risk profiles. Insurers are repricing upward post-reform as the cost of possession proceedings increases
Legal expenses insurance
Standalone legal expenses insurance covers the solicitor and court costs of possession proceedings without the rent guarantee element. This is a lower-cost option, often £70 to £150 per year, that addresses the increased cost of section 8 proceedings without requiring full rent guarantee referencing. Suitable for landlords with strong tenant selection but who want downside protection on legal costs.
Important caveats on insurance
Insurance is a complement to good management, not a substitute for it. Two limitations are worth understanding before relying on these products:
- The tenants most likely to cause possession problems are also the ones least likely to pass RGI referencing criteria. The product is most readily available when you least need it. For genuinely high-risk tenancies, specialist insurers exist but premiums reflect the risk
- Procedural compliance is critical. Most policies require the landlord to have followed correct legal process precisely. An error in serving a rent increase notice, or a failure to protect a deposit correctly, can void a claim. Good documentation is therefore a prerequisite for insurance to function as intended
The areas landlords need to understand properly
Possession is slower at the margins, not impossible. Section 21 is gone, so landlords must use section 8 grounds. The Act preserves routes to recover possession where there is a genuine reason, including rent arrears, anti-social behaviour, sale and occupation by the landlord or close family member. Selling and move-in grounds carry restrictions on when they can be used and require the correct notice to be served for each situation. That does not remove the exit. It means the exit must be planned, not improvised.
Rent management becomes more disciplined. Landlords can still increase rent, but the route is standardised. Under section 13, increases are limited to once per year with at least two months notice. Critically, tenants retain the right to challenge any increase they consider above market rate at the First-tier Tribunal and doing so delays the increase even if the Tribunal ultimately agrees with the landlord. A landlord who reviews rent annually with documented comparable evidence is far less exposed than one who tries to catch up in a single jump.
New written statement requirements for new tenancies. All new tenancies created on or after 1 May 2026 must include prescribed written information about key tenancy terms, either within the tenancy agreement itself or in a separate written statement. Failure to comply risks a fine of up to £7,000. This is a straightforward compliance step but one the original commentary from some sources has underplayed.
The best landlords were already moving this way. Well-run landlords already document repairs, inspect sensibly, keep arrears logs, benchmark rent, and communicate in writing. The Act therefore narrows the gap between amateur and professional operators. If your business model only worked because section 21 was available as a reset button, the reforms will feel severe. If your model was built on good stock, fair rents and sound management, the impact is much smaller.
Myth versus reality
| Myth | Reality |
|---|---|
| Landlords cannot remove bad tenants anymore | Landlords can still seek possession using statutory grounds. The real issue is proving the ground and following the correct process |
| Periodic tenancies destroy certainty | They reduce fixed-term lock-in, but also create one simpler legal framework and force stronger tenant selection at the outset |
| The pet rules mean every property becomes pet-friendly | Landlords must consider requests and justify refusals. Insurance, superior lease terms and genuine property constraints still matter |
| Existing paperwork all has to be rewritten | Most existing written tenancies do not need re-issuing, but the required Information Sheet must be served on relevant tenants by 31 May 2026, with fines up to £7,000 for non-compliance |
| Short-term and corporate lets are affected | These arrangements fall outside the assured tenancy regime. Short-term holiday lets and company tenancies are not impacted by the reforms |
| This is the end of buy-to-let as an asset class | The reforms raise management standards. They do not remove rental demand, legal possession routes, or the ability to grow rent lawfully over time |
A sensible landlord conclusion
The Renters Rights Act is not a non-event, and landlords who dismiss it will make avoidable mistakes. But the strongest version of the bearish case is still overstated. Possession claims run at around 0.65% of tenancies annually one in 155 properties, and are concentrated in specific higher-risk segments of the market. For a well-run portfolio in lower-risk locations, the direct financial exposure is modest.
What the Act does do is penalise poor systems. That is why the right commercial response is not retreat. It is better underwriting, cleaner files, earlier intervention, stronger compliance and a longer-term business plan. For landlords operating in higher-yield or higher-risk segments - HMOs, deprived areas, benefit tenancies the combination of tighter process and appropriate insurance products provides a workable framework.
For landlords operating outside the assured tenancy regime, short-term lets, corporate lets, high-value tenancies, the reforms are largely irrelevant to their existing operating model.
For landlords prepared to operate professionally, the reforms are far more manageable than the headlines suggest.
Key dates
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 27 October 2025 | Royal Assent |
| 27 December 2025 | Local authority investigatory powers came into force |
| 30 April 2026 | Last day a valid section 21 notice can be served |
| 1 May 2026 | Phase 1 commencement: ASTs convert to assured periodic tenancies, section 21 abolished, rent increase rules take effect, pet request rules apply, new written statement requirement for new tenancies |
| 31 May 2026 | Deadline to provide the government Information Sheet to existing tenants with written terms. Fine up to £7,000 for non-compliance |
| 31 July 2026 | Deadline to commence court proceedings on any section 21 notice served before 1 May 2026 |
| Late 2026 onwards | PRS Database phased regional rollout begins. Landlord Ombudsman set-up begins |
| Around 2028 | Mandatory landlord registration on PRS Database and Ombudsman membership expected |
| 2035 to 2037 | Decent Homes Standard and Awaabs Law proposed for full implementation (subject to consultation) |
Sources
- GOV.UK, Guide to the Renters Rights Act, published 6 November 2025
- GOV.UK, Implementing the Renters Rights Act 2025: Our roadmap for reforming the Private Rented Sector, published 13 November 2025
- GOV.UK, The Renters Rights Act Information Sheet 2026, published 20 March 2026
- GOV.UK, Assured tenancy forms for privately rented properties from 1 May 2026, published 20 March 2026
- Ministry of Justice, Mortgage and Landlord Possession Statistics, October to December 2024 and January to March 2025
- The Health Foundation, Trends in eviction and mortgage possession claims in England, 2025
- Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, English Housing Survey 2024 to 2025 Headline Report
- Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, English Private Landlord Survey 2024
- Renters Rights Act 2025, legislation.gov.uk
This article is a commercial summary and not legal advice. Readers should verify current requirements against GOV.UK guidance and seek professional legal advice before taking action.

